Defining Terrorism at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Authors

  • Prakash Puchooa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.227

Keywords:

Law, Lebanon

Abstract

On 16 February 2011, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) issued an interlocutory decision regarding the legal definition of terrorism.This decision was in response to a Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC) list of questions requesting, inter alia, an elaboration of the elements of this crime.In exploring this matter, the Appeals Chamber defined the subjective (mens rea) and objective elements (actus reus) of terrorism by referring to domestic Lebanese law and international law. It thereby set out the applicable law for the court. The consequence of this decision however is not limited to the law of STL but may be seen as having far-reaching consequences for the conception of terrorism under both international law and International Criminal Law (ICL). Given the significance of the Appeals Chamber judgment, this paper will scrutinise three areas of concern regarding its propriety:

Author Biography

Prakash Puchooa

Prakash Puchooa is a Graduate Student at UCL who is researching the use of judicial discretion in International Criminal Law. He is the recipient of the UCL Law Department Scholarship for 2008 and his legal experience includes working with the Defence Support Section (DSS) of the Extraordinary Court of Chambers in Cambodia (ECCC) and the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC). He is currently in his final year at UCL.

Downloads

Published

2011-11-11

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2011)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2011 The Author(s)

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).