Understanding Political Influence in Modern-Era Conflict:A Qualitative Historical Analysis of Hassan Nasrallah’s Speeches

Authors

  • Reem Abu-Lughod California State University, Bakersfield
  • Samuel Warkentin California State University, San Bernardino

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.382

Keywords:

Politics of government, Invasion, War and Conflict, Hezbollah, Lebanon, Israel, Middle East.

Abstract

Understanding Political Influence in Modern-Era Conflict:

A Qualitative Historical Analysis of Hassan Nasrallah’s Speeches

Abstract

This research examines and closely analyzes speeches delivered by Hezbollah’s secretary general and spokesman, Hassan Nasrallah, from a content analysis perspective. We reveal that several significant political phenomena that have occurred in Lebanon were impacted by the intensity of speeches delivered by Nasrallah; these three events being the 2006 War, the Doha Agreement, and the 2008 prisoner exchange. Data has been collected from transcribed speeches and analyzed using a qualitative historical analysis. Furthermore, we use latent analysis to assess Nasrallah’s underlying implications of his speeches and identify the themes he uses to influence his audience.

Author Biographies

Reem Abu-Lughod, California State University, Bakersfield

Department of Criminal Justice

Assistant Professor

Samuel Warkentin, California State University, San Bernardino

National Security Studies Program

Graduate Student

Downloads

Published

2012-09-22

Issue

Section

Articles